This week I watched the first
episode of Mindhunter. This show
takes place in the late 1970’s and it follows a young FBI agent, Holden Ford.
He works in the hostage negotiation department and teaches classes about it to
students in the agency. He struggles with keeping the attention of his
students, as they don’t find value in what he has to say. After Holden
personally encounters a hostage situation where a man takes off his clothes and
claims that he is invisible, his interest is sparked. He wants to learn more
about human behavior, specifically deviancy. Holden believes that this is
something that is extremely important to be able to better understand the
criminal motive, but the people around him don’t feel the same way.
The main overarching theme of the
first episode is why do we behave the way we do? This is the question that Ford
is on a quest to find the answer to the entire episode. The FBI and other law
enforcement agencies are now faced with the possibility of never understanding
a criminal’s motive. It’s no longer out of lust or greed but now seems entirely
random. Ford desires to dive further into criminal psychology to find the
answers he is looking for. He is repetitively disregarded by fellow agents and
other law enforcement agencies. Ford is far ahead of his time, and everyone around
him believes there are many more important things to be focusing on. Towards
the end of the episode he travels to Fairfield, Iowa to speak to their local
police department about serial killers and their motives. He speaks about
Charles Manson, and rationalizes that maybe Manson did what he did because of
his abusive childhood, or the amount of time he was institutionalized. The
audience is in complete dismay that he would even suggest that there was a
rational reason for Manson’s killings. Many of the local officers speak up and
say that they believe that crazy people are just crazy and that Charles Manson
was just “born that way.”
In the last few moments, Bill,
Ford’s coworker that he traveled to Iowa with says, “Let me tell you something
about abhorrent behavior, Ford. It’s f**king abhorrent. If we understood it,
we’d be abhorrent, too.” This quote is jarring and begs so many questions. It
completely encases the theme of this entire episode, Ford’s journey to
understand human behavior. This brought me to the question of, do we even
completely understand deviance today? First off, how do we define deviance?
Yes, we have a dictionary definition of deviance, but there is not a concrete
way to label something as deviant behavior. It is more of a socially defined
construct, rather than a concrete label. We make up what is “deviant” and what
is not. Just because you deviate from a
norm or break a law does that make you a horrible person? Politicians and big
business’ break the law every day and we do nothing about it. Yes, the
criminals in this show have done some terrible things, don’t get me wrong, but
some of them are misunderstood. I don’t believe anyone is born with a
predisposition to kill another human being. Often times they do not know how to
check their aggression and how to express feelings, because of past trauma and
a troubled childhood. This show is very interesting, and I think I will
continue to watch it to figure out how we stumbled upon methods of criminal
behavior and profiling.
I think you hit on many of the important questions this show provides in your last paragraph. I think they lead into my main question which is why do you think that this show is being created now? Is this a reflection of history or modern society?
ReplyDelete