Little Evil: An Actually Good Movie Spoof?

In 1974, Mel Brooks took the world by storm with the release of two ultra successful spoof films Blazing Saddles and Young Frankenstein. After the financial and critical successes of these films, the spoof became a popular genre. Shortly after saw the release of three Monty Python films, Airplane!, Top Secret!, Spaceballs, and the Naked Gun trilogy. All of the previously mentioned films have become classics of their own. Arguably on genre was as successful as the spoof was in the 1980s. That success saw a turn for the worse starting in 1995 with Dracula: Dead and Loving It. While there had been bad spoofs before, this one was directed by the master of the genre Mel Brooks. The film was so detrimental to Mr. Brooks that he never returned to the director's chair following the flop. It soon became rare that a spoof would actually be a quality film with the market flooded by the likes of the Scary Movie franchise, Meet the Spartans, Vampires Suck, and the various Movie movies (Disaster Movie, Date Movie, Superhero Movie, etc.). In fact, the last "good" spoof movie was Shrek the Third from 2007, and that was a film that is widely regarded as the worst in the franchise. Ten years later, director Eli Craig of Tucker and Dale vs. Evil fame directed Little Evil, a spoof off of the popular 70s horror film The Omen staring Adam Scott (Parks and Recreation) as Gary, a man who recently married Samantha, played by Evangeline Lily (Lost, The Hobbit Trilogy). Gary soon finds out that Samantha's odd son Lucas may very well be the antichrist.
So, can Little Evil be the first good spoof film in a decade, a streak that has lasted for three presidents? For the most part, yes. The main thing about the film that works is that it actually is pretty funny. Craig also writes the film and infuses it with clever humor and smart horror movies references and callbacks to films like Poltergeist while completely avoiding trash humor such as sex jokes and defecating jokes. Not only is the writing funny and smart, but the actors pull the humorous writing off . especially Bridgett Everett (Trainwreck) as Adam's friend AL, a gay tomboy who loves to drink, curse, and call people "man." This is the kind of character who usually gets really annoying really fast, but Everett really pulls the role off strong. I'm really curious as to see what she does next in film. Adam Scott is also pretty funny in the film, mainly due to his, for the most part, subtle delivery and his everyman appearance. His reactions to the supernatural events are accurate, funny, and probably how most sane, smart people would react to the situations.
The other major strength of the film is that there is some heart and depth to the film. Most spoof films are content with staying with surface level filmmaking, never daring to attempt to dig deeper. This film, however, does. The film really deals with the issues that stepparents have when it comes to raising children that are not of their own. Quite frankly, I didn't expect the film to do this. I mean, when's the last time you've watched a comedy or horror film that also tries to be Terms of Endearment? This is a very welcome change to the genre and one that kept me invested in the film throughout it's length. Even some of the classics like Monty Python and the Holy Grail don't have much below the surface. The difference, though, is that some of those classics are much funnier than Little Evil, even though it is still a pretty funny film. Therefore, the film makes up for it where needed. Even if it hadn't work (which it did), it would at least have been admirable.
Another small plus to the film I wanted to point out is how it dealt with the supernaturalness of the film. Usually films like this find a way to seem insulting to those with religion, whether it be Christians, Jews, or Muslims. This film, however, did avoid this fatal blow that could have undone everything quality in the film. In fact, the film is quite innocent in every way except for the language, which is another rarity for spoofs and comedies in general in this day and age.
Honestly, the only real problems I have regarding the film is that it definitely takes a cliched route through the film. At one point, a certain character actor pops up playing a seemingly good character, however I knew almost instantly that he was evil, which, shock and awe, he was. Very little in the film is unpredictable and much of which has been done better before. Not that this film does these things bad, it's just that they don't compare in quality to how some other films have before. In all fairness, there is one plot twist that did actually sort of surprise me, which definitely caught me off guard.
If you're in the mood to watch a horror film because, hey, it is almost Halloween, but you don't want to watch anything that will scare you into the fetal position, then I think this is a good option for a watch. It's funny, relatively short, and at times even charming. Little Evil is, without question, the best spoof in a very long time.

Movie Little Evil

Little Evil is a horror-comedy movie. Gary’s stepson Lucas had a supernatural power to make horrible thing happen. Gary was told his stepson was the antiChrist, and he tended to kill him in his sixth birthday at six o’clock in order to save the world. When Gary took Lucas out to the water park, and he decided to save Lucas rather than kill him. The truth was that Lucas was not Satan itself but the portal of evil. If Lucas dies, the world will end. Gary saved the child and the world with his love.  

The beginning sequence of the movie was shot in a thunderstorm night. The director used backlight to introduce Lucas to the audience. Due to the backlight, Lucas’ face was shadowed, and the audience could not see clear. When Gary moved to live with Lucas, he saw Lucas was on the swing. In this scene, the director used backlight again, creating a great contrast between the sunshine and Lucas. By doing this, the movie conveyed a sense of horror to the audience.

The proximity to the camera in this movie were different. To show the characters’ facial expression, the director mainly used medium close-up shot. These facial expression was not very significant to the whole story. The director only used close-up shot in the water park to show their happiness on the face, and the angry on Lucas’ face when Gary was caught by police. These close-up shots were a symbol of their warmup relationship. The other proximity shots also used throughout the movie, but the medium shot was the most common one in this movie.

The director made effort to control the depth of the shot too. The shot was pretty deep when the scenes happened in outside. A deep-space provided the audience a broad background. When a bad guy was making a deal with Gary on the nunnery, which used to hold the cult rite of killing the evil kid, the shot focus changed from background to the foreground, focusing on Gary and the bag guy. At the same time, the bad guy was saying something about the end of the world, which raised the audience’s curiosity.    

 The camera angle in this movie was very important to depict Lucas’ character. Low angle was used in the Gary’s wedding. In the video, the tornado was hitting the wedding in a very high speed. With his head down, Lucas was shot in the background of the video from a low angle. The tornado was behind Locas, and everything was flying in the sky, however the child’s hair didn’t move at all. The low angle shot made Locas look extremely powerful and horrible. The director also used eye level angle to shot the children.

In all, this was a funny movie. One thing I want to talk more about the movie was why people always blame the adult rather the child. In this movie, Lucas killed his teacher indirectly, however, it was Gary who was asked to see a therapist. When Gary talked about Lucas’ behavior with his wife, his wife thought the child had nothing wrong and should not be blamed. Is that funny?